Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
RFO UPF ; 28(1): 69-77, 20230808.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1509413

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: O objetivo desta revisão de literatura é evidenciar o papel da infecção e inflamação na etiopatogenia da osteonecrose dos maxilares induzida por medicamentos (MRONJ). Revisão da literatura: A MRONJ é uma condição rara e grave que impacta negativamente a vida dos pacientes afetados. Sua etiopatogenia é multifatorial e ainda não foi totalmente compreendida. Uma das hipóteses propostas para explicá-la sugere que, além da inibição do turnover ósseo pelos medicamentos antirreabsortivos, a infecção associada à exodontia e a inflamação local desempenham papel decisivo no desencadeamento da condição. O entendimento da etiopatogenia da MRONJ permite ao cirurgião-dentista a identificação dos pacientes com risco maior para a doença, assim como o auxilia no monitoramento e escolha do manejo mais adequado. No campo da pesquisa, ele pode aprimorar estudos pré-clínicos e aprofundar a investigação de biomarcadores para diagnóstico precoce de MRONJ. Considerações finais: Conhecer a contribuição da infecção e inflamação na etiopatogênese da MRONJ é fundamental para orientar a pesquisa e a adoção de estratégias preventivas para os pacientes em risco, e de manejo e monitoramento adequado para aqueles já acometidos. (AU)


Aim: The aim of this literature review is to highlight the role of infection and inflammation in the etiopathogenesis of drug-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). Literature review: MRONJ is a rare and serious condition that negatively impacts the lives of affected patients. Its etiopathogenesis is multifactorial and has not yet been fully understood. One of the hypotheses proposed to explain it suggests that, in addition to the inhibition of bone turnover by antiresorptive drugs, the infection associated with tooth extraction and local inflammation play a decisive role in triggering the condition. Understanding the etiopathogenesis of MRONJ allows the dentist to identify patients at higher risk for the disease, as well as assisting in monitoring and choosing the most appropriate management. In research, it can improve preclinical studies and deepen the investigation of biomarkers for early diagnosis of MRONJ. Conclusion: Knowing the contribution of infection and inflammation in the etiopathogenesis of MRONJ is essential to guide research and the adoption of preventive strategies for patients at risk, and adequate management and monitoring for those already affected.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/physiopathology , Inflammation/physiopathology , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects
2.
Salud mil ; 42(1): e402, 05/05/2023. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1531499

ABSTRACT

Introducción: dada la alta prescripción de bifosfonatos, presentamos sus efectos adversos en la esfera odontológica, siendo una complicación poco frecuente, pero de difícil tratamiento. Sin necesidad de suspender el tratamiento, dado el importante beneficio en cuanto a la prevención de fractura por fragilidad. Estas fracturas causan una alta morbimortalidad en contraposición al bajo riesgo que conlleva la Osteonecrosis mandibular asociada a bifosfonatos. Objetivo: orientar al personal de salud que maneja estos fármacos y quien asiste dichas complicaciones a poseer conocimientos para la prevención de osteonecrosis. Identificar y diferenciar los pacientes con mayor riesgo, de acuerdo con la dosis de bifosfonatos y la frecuencia del tratamiento. Materiales y Método: se realizó una revisión bibliográfica en las siguientes fuentes: Scielo, Google académico, Medline/Pubmed, Biblioteca Virtual en Salud (Brasil), desde el año 2005 a la fecha, idiomas español, portugués e inglés. Los descriptores utilizados son bifosfonatos, mandíbula, maxilar, odontología, osteonecrosis, osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociada a bifosfonatos. Resultados: las últimas pautas de tratamiento fueron modificadas en 2014, por consenso de la Asociación Americana de cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial. La patogénesis de la osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a bifosfonatos no está completamente definida, aunque las publicaciones tratan de explicarla. El riesgo de desarrollarla por terapia oral es menor que por su administración vía intravenosa. Discusión: el médico que prescribe el antirresortivo debe conocer el estado de salud dental de su paciente y, en lo posible, remitirlo a examen con el odontólogo antes de iniciar la terapia con bifosfonatos.


Introduction: Given the high prescription of bisphosphonates, we present their adverse effects in the dental sphere, being an infrequent complication, but difficult to treat. There is no need to suspend treatment, given the important benefit in terms of prevention of fragility fractures. These fractures cause high morbimortality as opposed to the low risk associated with bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw. Objective: To orient the health personnel who handle these drugs and who assist these complications to have knowledge for the prevention of osteonecrosis. To identify and differentiate patients at higher risk, according to the dose of bisphosphonates and frequency of treatment. Materials and Method: A literature review was performed in the following sources: Scielo, Google academic, Medline/Pubmed, Virtual Health Library (Brazil), from 2005 to date, Spanish, Portuguese and English languages. The descriptors used were bisphosphonates, mandible, maxilla, dentistry, osteonecrosis, osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with bisphosphonates. Results: The latest treatment guidelines were modified in 2014, by consensus of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The pathogenesis of bisphosphonate-associated maxillary osteonecrosis is not completely defined, although publications try to explain it. The risk of developing it by oral therapy is lower than by intravenous administration. Discussion: The physician who prescribes the antiresorptive drug should know the dental health status of his patient and, if possible, refer him for examination by a dentist before initiating bisphosphonate therapy.


Introdução: dada a alta prescrição de bisfosfonatos, apresentamos seus efeitos adversos na esfera odontológica, uma complicação rara, mas de difícil tratamento. Sem a necessidade de suspender o tratamento, dado o importante benefício em termos de prevenção de fraturas por fragilidade. Essas fraturas causam alta morbidade e mortalidade, em contraste com o baixo risco associado à osteonecrose da mandíbula associada aos bisfosfonatos. Objetivo: orientar a equipe de saúde que manipula esses medicamentos e que atende a essas complicações para que tenham conhecimento sobre a prevenção da osteonecrose. Identificar e diferenciar os pacientes de maior risco, de acordo com a dose de bisfosfonatos e a frequência do tratamento. Materiais e Método: foi realizada uma revisão da literatura nas seguintes fontes: Scielo, Google acadêmico, Medline/Pubmed, Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (Brasil), de 2005 até a presente data, idiomas espanhol, português e inglês. Os descritores utilizados foram: bisfosfonatos, mandíbula, maxila, odontologia, osteonecrose, osteonecrose dos maxilares associada a bisfosfonatos. Resultados: as diretrizes de tratamento mais recentes foram modificadas em 2014, por consenso da Associação Americana de Cirurgia Oral e Maxilofacial. A patogênese da osteonecrose da mandíbula associada a bisfosfonatos não está totalmente definida, embora a literatura tente explicá-la. O risco de desenvolvê-la com a terapia oral é menor do que com a administração intravenosa. Discussão: o médico que prescreve o medicamento deve estar ciente do estado de saúde bucal do paciente e, se possível, encaminhar o paciente para ser examinado por um dentista antes de iniciar a terapia com bisfosfonatos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/drug therapy
3.
Rev. Fundac. Juan Jose Carraro ; 25(45): 26-31, 2022. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1437486

ABSTRACT

La osteoporosis se caracteriza por una masa ósea baja con deterioro de la microarquitectura del tejido que conduce a la fragilidad, lo que aumenta el riesgo de fracturas. Después de la menopausia, la deficiencia de estrógenos aumenta la exposición del tejido al ligan- do RANK, lo que resulta en un aumento de la reabsorción y pérdida ósea, que pueden provocar osteoporosis. (1) Los bifosfonatos y el denosumab son utilizados para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis debido a su capacidad anticatabólica, que reducen la remodelación previniendo la pérdida de masa ósea, disminuyendo la probabilidad de fracturas y aumentando la densidad mineral del tejido. (2) La osteonecrosis de los maxilares asociadas a drogas antirresortivas es una situación que se presenta en pacientes que consumen de manera crónica antirresortivos para el tratamiento de enfermedades como: osteoporosis, osteogénesis imperfecta, enfermedad de Paget, displasia fi- brosa, hipercalcemia maligna asociada a tratamiento oncológico (AU)


Osteoporosis is characterized by low bone mass with deterioration of the tissue microarchitec- ture leading to fragility, which increases the risk of fractures. After menopause, estrogen deficiency increases tissue exposure to the RANK ligand, resulting in increased bone loss and resorption, which can lead to osteoporosis. (1) Bisphosphonates and denosumab are used for the treatment in low concentration, due to their anticatabolic capacity, which reduce remodeling, preventing loss of bone mass and fractures besides, antiresorptives drugs increase the mineral density of the tissue. (2) Osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with antiresorptives drugs occurs in patients whose chro- nically consume these drugs for the treatment of diseases such as: osteoporosis, imperfect osteogenesis, Paget's disease, fibrous dysplasia, malignant hypercalcemia associated with oncological treatment (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , RANK Ligand/physiology , Denosumab/adverse effects , Mouth Rehabilitation/methods
4.
Arch. endocrinol. metab. (Online) ; 64(6): 664-672, Nov.-Dec. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1142212

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Antiresorptive therapy is the main form of prevention of osteoporotic or fragility fractures. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a relatively rare but severe adverse reaction to antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs. Physicians and dentists caring for patients taking these drugs and requiring invasive procedures face a difficult decision because of the potential risk of MRONJ. The aim of this study was to discuss the risk factors for the development of MRONJ and prevention of this complication in patients with osteoporosis taking antiresorptive drugs and requiring invasive dental treatment. For this goal, a task force with representatives from three professional associations was appointed to review the pertinent literature and discuss systemic and local risk factors, prevention of MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis, and management of established MRONJ. Although scarce evidence links the use of antiresorptive agents in the context of osteoporosis to the development of MRONJ, these agents are considered a risk factor for this complication. Despite the rare reports of MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis, the severity of symptoms and impact of MRONJ in the patients' quality of life make it imperative for health care professionals to consider this complication when planning invasive dental procedures.


Subject(s)
Humans , Osteoporosis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Oral Medicine , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Pathology, Oral , Quality of Life , Brazil , Diphosphonates
5.
São Paulo med. j ; 138(4): 326-335, July-Aug. 2020. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, SES-SP | ID: biblio-1139704

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is still the most prevalent type of osteonecrosis with clinical relevance. In Brazil, bisphosphonate use is high but there is a lack of epidemiological studies on BRONJ. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical profile of BRONJ in a Brazilian population through an integrative review. DESIGN AND SETTING: Integrative review of BRONJ in a Brazilian population. METHODS: Cases and clinical research on Brazilians with BRONJ between 2010 and 2019, indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS were reviewed. Age, sex, type and time of bisphosphonate intake, administration route, related diseases, region of the BRONJ, diagnostic criteria, staging, triggering factor and type of treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifteen articles on 128 subjects were included. Most patients were women (82.03%); the mean age was 63 years. Intravenous zoledronic acid was mostly used (62.50%), for breast cancer treatment (46.87%). The main localization of BRONJ was the mandible (54.68%), associated mainly with tooth extractions (45.98%). The diagnostic criteria were clinical (100%) and radiographic (89.06%), mostly in stage II (68.08%). The surgical treatments were sequestrectomy (37.50%) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (36.71%). Microbial control was done using chlorhexidine (93.75%) and infection control using clindamycin (53.90%). CONCLUSIONS: BRONJ had higher prevalence in Brazilian women receiving treatment for breast cancer and osteoporosis. The mandible was the region most affected with a moderate stage of BRONJ, particularly when there were histories of tooth extraction and peri-implant surgery. Sequestrectomy with additional drugs and surgical therapy was the treatment most accomplished.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Tooth Extraction , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/surgery , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Brazil , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Dental Care , Treatment Outcome , Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Diphosphonates/administration & dosage , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging
6.
Rev. ADM ; 74(5): 252-260, sept.-oct. 2017. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-973045

ABSTRACT

Los bifosfonatos son un grupo de medicamentos que se han estadoutilizando en los últimas décadas para el tratamiento de padecimientos que se caracterizan por destrucción o pérdida ósea, cáncer, menopausiay enfermedades óseas no malignas por lo cual es muy importante realizar una amplia y correcta historia clínica para evitar las posibles complicaciones en la fase de cicatrización de los procedimientos quirúrgicos odontológicos. Al atender a un paciente con antecedentes de haber usado este medicamento, se debe conocer la farmacocinética y farmacodinamia para poder planificar el tratamiento pre-, trans- y postoperatorio de los pacientes que serían sometidos principalmente a extracciones dentarias, por lo cual actualmente se puede clasificar a este tipo de pacientes de acuerdo a los resultados de la prueba de laboratorio de la proteína C-telopéptido. Una vez determinado el riesgo del paciente de acuerdo a los resultados de dicha prueba se puede realizar un plan de tratamiento más seguro y eficaz para el paciente en donde se tomen las precauciones necesarias para no evitar una osteonecrosis mandibular o maxilar. Se presenta un caso clínico de un paciente con historia de bifosfonatos en donde se hace el tratamiento de acuerdo a los lineamientos actuales para tratar a este tipo de pacientes.


Bisphosphonates are a group medications that have been used for the last decades for the treatment of conditions that are characterized bybone loss or destruction, cancer, menopause and non-malignant bone diseases, which is why it is very important to make a broad and correctmedical history to avoid the possible complications in the healing phaseof dental surgical treatments. When treating a patient with a history of this drug we should know the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to be able to plan the pre, trans and postoperative treatment of patientsmainly subject to dental extractions, which is why currently this type ofpatients can be classified according to the results of the laboratory testof the C-Telopeptide protein. Once the patient’s risk has been determined according to the results of this test, an effective and safe treatmentplan can be started for the patient in which the necessary precautionsare taken to not develop a mandibular or maxillary osteonecrosis. We present a case of a patient with a history of bisphosphonates wherethe treatment is done according to the current guidelines for treatingthis type of patients.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Clinical Protocols , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Tooth Extraction/standards , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control
7.
Actual. osteol ; 13(2): 104-115, Mayo - Ago. 2017. ilus, graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1117988

ABSTRACT

La osteonecrosis de maxilar asociada a aminobisfosfonatos (BRONJ) constituye un efecto secundario del tratamiento crónico con los más potentes. Un modelo experimental permitiría determinar la patogenia de dicha alteración. La oveja presenta características orales y del metabolismo óseo similar al humano y permite realizar manipulaciones bucales. Se evaluaron cambios clínicos, remodelación ósea y masa ósea maxilar en ovejas hembras adultas tratadas con zolendronato (ZOL), durante 22 meses y utilizando dosis equivalente al tratamiento de neoplasias. Seis ovariectomizadas (OVX) recibieron ZOL; 5 OVX y 4 SHAM (control) recibieron solución fisiológica. Al inicio, 4 y 22 meses se evaluó calcemia, fosfatemia, crosslaps (CTX) y fosfatasa alcalina ósea. Al final, se evaluó contenido mineral óseo de la hemimandíbula superior (CMO: mg/cm2). Al final del estudio, CTX disminuyó significativamente en ZOL (p<0,05) sin diferencias entre SHAM y OVX. En maxilar, los contenidos de Ca y P (g/g tejido) y CMO (g/cm2 ) disminuyeron en OVX vs. SHAM (p<0,05) y solo Ca y CMO respecto de ZOL (p<0,05). ZOL incrementó el contenido de Ca y CMO, mientras que el de P permaneció significativamente disminuido respecto de SHAM. La sobrevida en SHAM y OVX fue del 100% y en ZOL 77% (2 muertes); 2 ovejas del grupo ZOL presentaron necrosis de maxilar. Conclusiones: fue posible obtener desarrollo de BRONJ por tratamiento crónico con ZOL, el cual redujo notablemente la resorción y, según la relación Ca/P, posiblemente haya afectado la mineralización ósea. (AU)


Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a complication of chronic treatment with the most powerful aminobisphosphonates (BPs). An experimental animal model would allow to determine the pathogenesis of this complication. Ewes exhibit similar oral cavity characteristics and bone metabolism as humans, and they are suitable for oral cavity interventions. We examined herein the clinical manifestations, bone remodeling status, and maxillary bone mass in adult female ewes treated with zoledronate (ZOL) for 22 months. Six ovariectomized (OVX) ewes received ZOL; and 5 OVX and 4 SHAM animals received saline solution. At the start of the experiment, and at the 4 and 22 month-time points serum Ca, P, crosslaps (CTX), and bone alkaline phosphatase were measured. Bone mineral content (BMC) of the superior hemimandible was measured at the end of the experiment. At this time point, CTX was significantly decreased only in the ZOL group (p<0.05). Ca and P content (g/g tissue) and BMC in the mandible were significantly decreased in the OVX group compared to SHAM animals (p<0.05) and only Ca content and BMC were decreased when compared to ZOL (p<0.05). ZOL treatment increased the Ca content and BMC, whereas the P content remained low compared to the SHAM group (p<0.05). All ewes from the SHAM and OVX groups and 77% of the animals from the ZOL group survived until the end of the experiment, whereas two ewes of ZOL group exhibited BRONJ. Conclusion: under our experimental conditions, it was possible to induce BRONJ by the chronic ZOL administration, which in turn induced a high reduction in bone resorption as well as possibly impaired bone mineralization, based on the Ca/P ratio in the mandible. (AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/pathology , Zoledronic Acid/adverse effects , Tooth Extraction , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/chemically induced , Sheep/metabolism , Sheep/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Densitometry , Experimental Development , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/immunology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Zoledronic Acid/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Ilium/cytology , Anesthetics, Dissociative/therapeutic use , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Maxilla/cytology , Maxilla/drug effects , Maxilla/metabolism , Maxilla/diagnostic imaging , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
8.
Braz. oral res. (Online) ; 30(1): e99, 2016. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-952039

ABSTRACT

Abstract The main objective of this study was to cause bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws to develop in a rodent model. Adult male Holtzman rats were assigned to one of two experimental groups to receive alendronate (AL; 1 mg/kg/week; n = 6) or saline solution (CTL; n = 6). After 60 days of drug therapy, all animals were subjected to first lower molar extraction, and 28 days later, animals were euthanized. All rats treated with alendronate developed osteonecrosis, presenting as ulcers and necrotic bone, associated with a significant infection process, especially at the inter-alveolar septum area and crestal regions. The degree of vascularization, the levels of C-telopeptide cross-linked collagen type I and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, as well as the bone volume were significantly reduced in these animals. Furthermore, on radiographic analysis, animals treated with alendronate presented evident sclerosis of the lamina dura of the lower first molar alveolar socket associated with decreased radiographic density in this area. These findings indicate that the protocol developed in the present study opens new perspectives and could be a good starting model for future property design.


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Alendronate/administration & dosage , Disease Models, Animal , Bone Density Conservation Agents/administration & dosage , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Peptides/blood , Time Factors , Tooth Extraction , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Biomarkers/blood , Bone Density/drug effects , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Tooth Socket/drug effects , Tooth Socket/pathology , Collagen Type I/blood , Alkaline Phosphatase/blood , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnostic imaging
9.
Dental press j. orthod. (Impr.) ; 19(4): 18-26, Jul-Aug/2014. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-725421

ABSTRACT

Bisphosphonates have been increasingly used not only to treat bone diseases as well as conditions such as osteopenia and osteoporosis, but also in oncotherapy. The use of bisphosphonates induces clinicians to fear and care. These reactions are associated with controversy resulting from lack of in-depth knowledge on the mechanisms of action as well as lack of a more accurate assessment of side effects. Scientific and clinical knowledge disclosure greatly contributes to professionals' discernment and inner balance, especially orthodontists. Fear does not lead to awareness. For these reasons, we present an article that focuses on that matter. This article was adapted from different journals of different dental specialties, as mentioned on footnote. There is no scientific evidence demonstrating that bisphosphonates are directly involved with etiopathogenic mechanisms of osteonecrosis and jaw osteomyelitis. Their use is contraindicated and limited in cases of dental treatment involving bone tissue. Nevertheless, such fact is based on professional opinion, case reports, and personal experience or experiment trials with failing methods. Additional studies will always be necessary; however, in-depth knowledge on bone biology is of paramount importance to offer an opinion about the clinical use of bisphosphonates and their further implications. Based on bone biopathology, this article aims at contributing to lay the groundwork for this matter.


Cada vez mais se usa os bisfosfonatos nos tratamentos de doenças e de estados ósseos, como a osteopenia e osteoporose, assim como nos protocolos oncoterápicos. O uso dos bisfosfonatos induz muitas reações de medo e cuidado, associadas a polêmicas e controvérsias quase sempre resultantes de uma falta de conhecimento mais profundo dos mecanismos de ação e da falta de uma avaliação mais criteriosa de seus efeitos colaterais. A divulgação e o conhecimento dos aspectos científicos e clínicos contribuem, em muito, para o discernimento e tranquilidade dos profissionais, especialmente dos ortodontistas. O medo não resulta em conscientização. Por essas razões, apresentamos alguns artigos sobre o mesmo assunto, semelhantes e adaptados, em revistas voltadas para as diferentes especialidades odontológicas, entre os quais o citado na nota de rodapé. Nos mecanismos etiopatogênicos da osteonecrose e nas osteomielites, nos maxilares, os bisfosfonatos não se encaixam como um dos fatores diretamente envolvidos e com base em evidências científicas. Suas contraindicações e limitações na prática odontológica como fator limitante de alguns tratamentos envolvendo o tecido ósseo estão baseadas, principalmente, em opiniões, casos clínicos e na experiência pessoal ou trabalhos experimentais com algumas falhas nos métodos experimentais. Sempre serão necessários mais estudos, mas um cuidado importante é se aprofundar no conhecimento da biologia óssea para, quando necessário, emitir-se opiniões sobre protocolos de conduta na clínica odontológica quanto ao uso bisfosfonatos e suas implicações. Esse artigo objetiva contribuir na fundamentação de abordagens sobre esse assunto a partir da biopatologia óssea.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Orthodontics, Corrective , Apoptosis/drug effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Density/drug effects , Bone Diseases, Metabolic/drug therapy , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Bone and Bones/drug effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Dentistry , Jaw Diseases/chemically induced , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Orthodontics, Corrective , Osteoclasts/drug effects , Osteomyelitis/chemically induced , Osteoporosis/drug therapy
10.
Arq. bras. endocrinol. metab ; 58(5): 523-529, 07/2014. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-719195

ABSTRACT

The objective this study was to summarize long-term risks associated with bisphosphonate therapy. Search of relevant medical publications for data from clinical trials, trial extensions, observational studies and post-marketing reports. Trial extensions and modifications did not reveal significant long-term safety issues. Observational data suggest at least as many benefits as risks. Post-marketing reports of musculoskeletal pain, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures have been widely circulated in the lay press. Most focus on long-terms risks has been on osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures which occur in patients who have not received bisphosphonate therapy but may be more frequent (though still uncommon) in patients who have been on treatment for 5 years or longer. Lower-risk patients may be able to stop treatment after 3-5 years for a “drug holiday,” which mitigates these long-term risks; for higher risk patients, therapy through 6-10 years appears to be advisable and offers more benefits than risks.


O objetivo deste estudo foi resumir os riscos associados ao tratamento a longo prazo com bisfosfonatos. Foram pesquisadas as publicações médicas relevantes incluindo ensaios clínicos, extensões de ensaios clínicos, estudos observacionais e relatórios pós-comercialização (vigilância farmacológica). As extensões e modificações de ensaios clínicos não indicaram nenhuma situação de alarme quanto à segurança dos bisfosfonatos a longo prazo. Dados observacionais sugerem pelo menos tantos benefícios quanto riscos. Entretanto, relatos pós-comercialização de dor musculoesquelética, osteonecrose da mandíbula e fraturas de fêmur atípicas foram amplamente divulgados na imprensa leiga. O foco nos riscos a longo prazo do tratamento com bisfosfonatos tem sido pincipalmente a osteonecrose da mandíbula e as fraturas atípicas de fêmur. Essas últimas, embora mais frequentes (ainda que pouco comuns) em pacientes que receberam tratamento com bisfosfonatos por 5 anos ou mais, podem ocorrer em indivíduos não tratados com esses medicamentos. Pacientes com baixo risco de fratura podem potencialmente parar o tratamento depois de 3 a 5 anos (“drug holiday”). Esse procedimento reduz os riscos desses medicamentos a longo prazo. Não obstante, nos pacientes de maior risco a terapia por 6 a 10 anos parece ser aconselhável e oferece mais benefícios do que riscos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/chemically induced , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Carcinoma/chemically induced , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/chemically induced , Femoral Fractures/chemically induced , Long-Term Care , Musculoskeletal Pain/chemically induced , Osteonecrosis/chemically induced , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
11.
Rev. Fac. Odontol. (B.Aires) ; 29(66): 37-42, ene.-jun.2014.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-761877

ABSTRACT

Los bisfosfonatos son fármacos utilizados para el tratamiento de enfermedades que afectan al metabolismo óseo, principalmente para el tratamiento de la osteoporosis, siendo ésta la principal causa de prescripción médica de los mismos. Actualmente, no se encuentran esclarecidas las posibles complicaciones o riesgos implícitos del tratamiento ortodóntico aplicado a pacientes que reciben o han recibidobisfosfonatos. Dada la demanda actual, con un elevado número de pacientes que se encuentran en la búsqueda de un tratamiento ortodóntico muchos de los cuales son y/o han sido tratados con bisfosfonatos para la osteoporosis, es de relevancia conocer el efecto de laaplicación de fuerzas ortodónticas en un tejido óseo que ha sido tratado con dichas drogas. Por lo antedicho, el objetivo de este trabajo, ha sido realizar una actualización sobre los nuevos conocimientos emergentes de las últimas publicaciones científicas provenientes de trabajos clínicos como así también experimentales que asocien la ortodoncia y los bisfosfonatos. Para ello se realizó una exhaustiva búsqueda de información en la base de datos de Pubmed. La búsqueda obtenida reveló que en los pacientes que reciben y/o han recibido bisfosfonatos y son tratados ortodónticamente se observa una disminución del movimiento dentario, escasa obtención de paralelismo radicular y, en los casos con exodoncias previas aparición de áreas de esclerosis ósea. No fueron descriptos casos en los que se viera asociada la aparición de osteonecrosis de los maxilares. Por su parte, los estudios experimentales, obtuvieron resultados orientados en el mismo sentido, avalando los resultados clínicos...


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Diphosphonates/adverse effects , Tooth Movement Techniques/adverse effects , Orthodontics, Corrective/adverse effects , Root Resorption/etiology , Root Resorption/chemically induced , Databases, Bibliographic , Dental Research , Sclerosis/etiology , Jaw/metabolism , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Alveolar Process/metabolism
12.
Braz. dent. j ; 24(6): 551-558, Nov-Dec/2013. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-697652

ABSTRACT

Bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis has been related to the cytotoxicity of these drugs on oral mucosa cells. A previous study showed that 5 µM of zoledronic acid (ZA), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is the highest concentration of this drug found in the oral cavity of patients under treatment. Therefore, in order to simulate an osteonecrosis clinical condition, the aim of this study was to evaluate the highest concentration of ZA applied on human epithelial cells (HaCaT) and gingival fibroblasts. For this purpose, cells (3×104 cells/cm2) were seeded in wells for 48 h using complete culture medium (cDMEM). After 48 h incubation, the cDMEM was replaced by fresh serum-free culture medium (DMEM-FBS) in which the cells were maintained for additional 24 h. Then, 5 µM ZA were added to the DMEM–FBS and the cells incubated in contact with the drug for 48 h. After this period, the number of viable cells (trypan blue), cell viability (MTT assay), total protein (TP) production and cell morphology (SEM analysis) were assessed. Data were analyzed statistically by Mann-Whitney, ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). ZA caused a significant reduction in the number of viable cells and decreased the metabolic activity of both cell lines. However, decrease of TP production occurred only in the epithelial cell cultures. Morphological alterations were observed in both cell types treated with ZA. In conclusion, ZA (5 µM) was cytotoxic to human epithelial cells and gingival fibroblast cultures, which could be associated, clinically, with the development of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis.


A osteonecrose induzida por bisfosfonatos tem sido associada a um efeito citotóxico destes medicamentos sobre as células da mucosa oral. Um estudo recente demonstrou que 5 µM de ácido zoledrônico (AZ), um potente bisfosfonato nitrogenado, foi a maior concentração encontrada na cavidade oral da pacientes em tratamento com este medicamento. Portanto, para simular esta condição in vivo, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito da aplicação desta concentração de AZ sobre células epiteliais (HaCaT) e fibroblasto de gengiva. As células foram semeadas (3×104 células/cm2) e incubadas por 48 h em placas de 24 compartimentos, utilizando meio de cultura completo (cDMEM). Após permanecer por 24 h em DMEM sem soro fetal bovino (DMEM-SFB), 5 µM do AZ foram adicionados a este meio de cultura, o qual foi incubado em contato com as células por 48 h. Após este período, foram avaliados o número de células viáveis (trypan blue), viabilidade celular (teste de MTT), produção de proteína total e a morfologia celular (MEV). Os dados obtidos foram submetidos aos testes estatísticos de Mann-Whitney e ANOVA complementada por testes de Tukey (p>0,05). Foi demonstrado que o AZ causou diminuição significativa no número de células viáveis, além de redução do metabolismo celular para ambos os tipos celulares avaliados. Porém, redução na produção de proteína total ocorreu apenas para as células epiteliais. Alterações morfológicas foram observadas em ambos os tipos celulares tratados com AZ. Estes dados científicos indicam que a concentração de AZ avaliada neste estudo (5 µM) apresenta ação citotóxica sobre células epiteliais e fibroblastos de gengiva, o que poderia estar associado, clinicamente, ao desenvolvimento da osteonecrose induzida por bisfosfonatos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bone Density Conservation Agents/toxicity , Diphosphonates/toxicity , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Gingiva/cytology , Imidazoles/toxicity , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Cell Count , Cells, Cultured , Cell Survival/drug effects , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , In Vitro Techniques , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
14.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 52(2): 265-270, mar.-abr. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-618380

ABSTRACT

Os bisfosfonatos (BFs) têm sido indicados para o tratamento de doenças do metabolismo ósseo. Atualmente, seu emprego terapêutico aumentou e, com ele, os efeitos adversos, dos quais um dos mais importantes é a indução da osteonecrose dos maxilares, uma complicação de difíceis tratamento e solução. Até o presente, não se sabe ao certo qual é o mecanismo de desenvolvimento da osteonecrose dos maxilares induzida por bisfosfonatos (ONMB), nem qual deve ser o tratamento estabelecido perante essa manifestação. Apesar de a literatura apresentar formas variadas de tratamento, não existe um protocolo definido. Apresentamos uma revisão sobre a ONMB, enfocando sua etiopatogenia e as formas reportadas de tratamento.


Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been used for the management of bone metabolic diseases. Currently their therapeutic use has increased, as also have their adverse effects, one of the most important being the bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ), a complication of difficult treatment and solution. Until now, the physiopathology of BRONJ remains unclear, and its treatment is uncertain. Although the literature provides several treatment options, there is no defined protocol. We present a review about BRONJ, focusing on its pathogenesis and its reported forms of treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/diagnosis , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/therapy
15.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-140192

ABSTRACT

Bisphosphonates constitute a group of drugs capable of modulating bone turnover and reduce its remodeling when an excessive resorption occurs. This is why they are indicated in a large group of bone diseases like postmenopausal osteoporosis or osteolysis associated with breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Over the last few years and due to their extensive use, many cases of complications associated with their use have been published. Among the most important possible adverse effects are the oral ones, with the appearance of ulcerations and, especially, osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with this therapy. In this paper, we have analyzed the general characteristics of these drugs and their mechanisms of action as well as the described adverse effects, especially oral and maxillofacial, have been made special reference, regarding the prevention of osteonecrosis of the jaws, heightened by cases described in the medical and odontological literature. The preventive protocol backs up the fundamental role of the odontologist in the effective prevention of this process before, during and after the treatment.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/prevention & control , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Remodeling/drug effects , Comprehensive Dental Care , Humans , Preventive Dentistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL